Skip to content

Compare models

Put up to 4 models beside each other — token prices, context windows, capabilities and provider, from the same catalogue the model pages read.

  1. Transcribe 1 ProFish AudioRemove
  2. Grok 4.7SpaceXAIRemove
  3. Claude Opus 5.5AnthropicRemove
transcribe-1-pro vs grok-4.7 vs claude-opus-5.5
AttributeTranscribe 1 Protranscribe-1-proGrok 4.7grok-4.7Claude Opus 5.5claude-opus-5.5
Pricing
Input$0 / 1M$1.60 / 1M$4.00 / 1M
Output$0 / 1M$4.80 / 1M$20.00 / 1M
Cache Write (5m)Not applicable$1.60 / 1M$5.00 / 1M
Cache Write (1h)Not applicable$1.60 / 1M$8.00 / 1M
Cache ReadNot applicable$1.60 / 1M$0.40 / 1M
Web Search$0 / 1M$0 / 1M$0 / 1M
Context
Max contextN/A500K1M
Max outputN/AN/AN/A
Capabilities
VisionNoYesYes
Function CallingNoYesYes
JSON ModeNoYesYes
StreamingNoYesYes
Catalogue
ProviderFish AudioSpaceXAIAnthropic
Categoryvoicechatchat
Charge typePay As You GoPay As You GoPay As You Go
Released2026-09-24——
Description
SummaryFish Audio Transcribe 1 Pro speech-to-text with speaker labels; transcripts include speaker tags such as <|speaker:0|>. Billed per second of audio.Grok 4.7 is SpaceXAI's flagship model for coding, agentic workflows, and professional knowledge work, succeeding Grok 4.6. It is particularly strong at long-running software engineering, self-verification, and long-context execution, while improving capabilities in document drafting, presentations, and other professional tasks. Trained with extended reinforcement learning focused on multi-hour problems, Grok 4.7 is optimized for sustained, complex task execution and natively supports the Grok Bot harness for conversational workflows. It also introduces an enhanced safeguard stack designed to combine strong jailbreak resistance with low refusal rates for legitimate technical work. Reported benchmark results use xhigh reasoning effort.Claude Opus 5.5 is Anthropic's flagship model for advanced reasoning, coding, and long-horizon agentic workflows, succeeding Opus 5. It excels at multi-step changes across large codebases, code review and bug detection, financial and scientific analysis, and understanding dense charts, diagrams, and screenshots, with stronger grounding when reporting figures and citing sources. Compared with Opus 5, it completes comparable tasks with fewer steps and lower token usage while providing clearer, more concise progress reporting. With adaptive thinking and configurable effort levels, Opus 5.5 can balance reasoning depth, latency, and cost, making it well suited for both demanding autonomous workflows and latency-sensitive professional tasks.