Skip to content

Compare models

Put up to 4 models beside each other — token prices, context windows, capabilities and provider, from the same catalogue the model pages read.

  1. S1Fish AudioRemove
  2. Transcribe 1 ProFish AudioRemove
  3. GPT-6 Luna ProOpenAIRemove
  4. Claude Opus 5.5AnthropicRemove

4 is the maximum. Remove one to add another.

s1 vs transcribe-1-pro vs gpt-6-luna-pro vs claude-opus-5.5
AttributeS1s1Transcribe 1 Protranscribe-1-proGPT-6 Luna Progpt-6-luna-proClaude Opus 5.5claude-opus-5.5
Pricing
Input$0 / 1M$0 / 1M$0.10 / 1M$4.00 / 1M
Output$0 / 1M$0 / 1M$0.50 / 1M$20.00 / 1M
Cache Write (5m)Not applicableNot applicable$0.10 / 1M$5.00 / 1M
Cache Write (1h)Not applicableNot applicable$0.10 / 1M$8.00 / 1M
Cache ReadNot applicableNot applicable$0.10 / 1M$0.40 / 1M
Web Search$0 / 1M$0 / 1M$0 / 1M$0 / 1M
Context
Max contextN/AN/A1.1M1M
Max outputN/AN/AN/AN/A
Capabilities
VisionNoNoYesYes
Function CallingNoNoYesYes
JSON ModeNoNoYesYes
StreamingNoNoYesYes
Catalogue
ProviderFish AudioFish AudioOpenAIAnthropic
Categoryvoicevoicechatchat
Charge typePay As You GoPay As You GoPay As You GoPay As You Go
Released2026-07-292026-09-24——
Description
SummaryFish Audio S1 text-to-speech. Billed per UTF-8 byte of input text.Fish Audio Transcribe 1 Pro speech-to-text with speaker labels; transcripts include speaker tags such as <|speaker:0|>. Billed per second of audio.GPT-6 Luna Pro uses the same underlying model as GPT-6 Luna, but runs with reasoning.mode set to pro for higher-quality responses on complex tasks. It combines Luna's speed and cost efficiency with deeper reasoning and more reliable multi-step execution, making it well suited for advanced coding, computer use, and agentic workflows where higher solution quality is needed without moving to a larger GPT-6 tier.Claude Opus 5.5 is Anthropic's flagship model for advanced reasoning, coding, and long-horizon agentic workflows, succeeding Opus 5. It excels at multi-step changes across large codebases, code review and bug detection, financial and scientific analysis, and understanding dense charts, diagrams, and screenshots, with stronger grounding when reporting figures and citing sources. Compared with Opus 5, it completes comparable tasks with fewer steps and lower token usage while providing clearer, more concise progress reporting. With adaptive thinking and configurable effort levels, Opus 5.5 can balance reasoning depth, latency, and cost, making it well suited for both demanding autonomous workflows and latency-sensitive professional tasks.