Skip to content

Compare models

Put up to 4 models beside each other — token prices, context windows, capabilities and provider, from the same catalogue the model pages read.

  1. Muse Glimmer 30BMetaRemove
  2. GPT-6 Luna ProOpenAIRemove
  3. Claude Opus 5.5AnthropicRemove
muse-glimmer-30b vs gpt-6-luna-pro vs claude-opus-5.5
AttributeMuse Glimmer 30Bmuse-glimmer-30bGPT-6 Luna Progpt-6-luna-proClaude Opus 5.5claude-opus-5.5
Pricing
Input$0.35 / 1M$0.10 / 1M$4.00 / 1M
Output$1.50 / 1M$0.50 / 1M$20.00 / 1M
Cache Write (5m)$0.35 / 1M$0.10 / 1M$5.00 / 1M
Cache Write (1h)$0.35 / 1M$0.10 / 1M$8.00 / 1M
Cache Read$0.35 / 1M$0.10 / 1M$0.40 / 1M
Web Search$0 / 1M$0 / 1M$0 / 1M
Context
Max context131K1.1M1M
Max outputN/AN/AN/A
Capabilities
VisionYesYesYes
Function CallingYesYesYes
JSON ModeYesYesYes
StreamingYesYesYes
Catalogue
ProviderMetaOpenAIAnthropic
Categorychatchatchat
Charge typePay As You GoPay As You GoPay As You Go
Released———
Description
SummaryMuse Glimmer 30B is a dense, open-weight multimodal model from Meta Superintelligence Labs, distilled from Muse Spark and optimized for autonomous agents on consumer hardware. It combines strong multi-step reasoning, reliable tool use, failure recovery, image understanding, and multilingual support across 100+ languages. Designed for long-horizon agentic and coding workflows, Muse Glimmer 30B offers a practical balance of capability and deployment efficiency, making it well suited for local coding assistants, multimodal agents, and production workflows that require sustained autonomous execution.GPT-6 Luna Pro uses the same underlying model as GPT-6 Luna, but runs with reasoning.mode set to pro for higher-quality responses on complex tasks. It combines Luna's speed and cost efficiency with deeper reasoning and more reliable multi-step execution, making it well suited for advanced coding, computer use, and agentic workflows where higher solution quality is needed without moving to a larger GPT-6 tier.Claude Opus 5.5 is Anthropic's flagship model for advanced reasoning, coding, and long-horizon agentic workflows, succeeding Opus 5. It excels at multi-step changes across large codebases, code review and bug detection, financial and scientific analysis, and understanding dense charts, diagrams, and screenshots, with stronger grounding when reporting figures and citing sources. Compared with Opus 5, it completes comparable tasks with fewer steps and lower token usage while providing clearer, more concise progress reporting. With adaptive thinking and configurable effort levels, Opus 5.5 can balance reasoning depth, latency, and cost, making it well suited for both demanding autonomous workflows and latency-sensitive professional tasks.