Compare models
Put up to 4 models beside each other — token prices, context windows, capabilities and provider, from the same catalogue the model pages read.
| Attribute | GPT-6 Luna Progpt-6-luna-pro | Perceptron Mk1.5perceptron-mk1.5 | Gemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing | |||
| Input | $0.10 / 1M | $0.15 / 1M | $1.50 / 1M |
| Output | $0.50 / 1M | $1.50 / 1M | $9.00 / 1M |
| Cache Write (5m) | $0.10 / 1M | $0.15 / 1M | $1.50 / 1M |
| Cache Write (1h) | $0.10 / 1M | $0.15 / 1M | $1.50 / 1M |
| Cache Read | $0.10 / 1M | $0.15 / 1M | $1.50 / 1M |
| Web Search | $0 / 1M | $0 / 1M | $0 / 1M |
| Context | |||
| Max context | 1.1M | 36.9K | 1M |
| Max output | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Capabilities | |||
| Vision | Yes | No | Yes |
| Function Calling | Yes | No | Yes |
| JSON Mode | Yes | No | Yes |
| Streaming | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Catalogue | |||
| Provider | OpenAI | Perceptron | |
| Category | chat | chat | chat |
| Charge type | Pay As You Go | Pay As You Go | Pay As You Go |
| Released | — | 2026-09-25 | — |
| Description | |||
| Summary | GPT-6 Luna Pro uses the same underlying model as GPT-6 Luna, but runs with reasoning.mode set to pro for higher-quality responses on complex tasks. It combines Luna's speed and cost efficiency with deeper reasoning and more reliable multi-step execution, making it well suited for advanced coding, computer use, and agentic workflows where higher solution quality is needed without moving to a larger GPT-6 tier. | Perceptron Mk1.5 chat model that accepts audio input. Audio and text input are billed per token. | Gemini 3.5 Flash is Google's high-efficiency multimodal model, delivering near-Pro level performance in coding and reasoning at Flash-tier speed and cost. It supports text, image, video, audio, and PDF inputs, making it well suited for diverse multimodal workflows. Optimized for coding proficiency and parallel agentic execution, the model defaults to medium thinking effort for faster, cost-efficient responses while supporting configurable thinking levels (minimal, low, medium, high) for fine-grained cost–performance control. |