Compare models
Put up to 4 models beside each other — token prices, context windows, capabilities and provider, from the same catalogue the model pages read.
| Attribute | GPT-6 Luna Progpt-6-luna-pro | GLM 5.3 Flashglm-5.3-flash | Claude Opus 5.5claude-opus-5.5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing | |||
| Input | $0.10 / 1M | $0.075 / 1M | $4.00 / 1M |
| Output | $0.50 / 1M | $0.25 / 1M | $20.00 / 1M |
| Cache Write (5m) | $0.10 / 1M | $0.075 / 1M | $5.00 / 1M |
| Cache Write (1h) | $0.10 / 1M | $0.075 / 1M | $8.00 / 1M |
| Cache Read | $0.10 / 1M | $0.075 / 1M | $0.40 / 1M |
| Web Search | $0 / 1M | $0 / 1M | $0 / 1M |
| Context | |||
| Max context | 1.1M | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Capabilities | |||
| Vision | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Function Calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| JSON Mode | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Streaming | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Catalogue | |||
| Provider | OpenAI | Z.AI | Anthropic |
| Category | chat | chat | chat |
| Charge type | Pay As You Go | Pay As You Go | Pay As You Go |
| Released | — | — | — |
| Description | |||
| Summary | GPT-6 Luna Pro uses the same underlying model as GPT-6 Luna, but runs with reasoning.mode set to pro for higher-quality responses on complex tasks. It combines Luna's speed and cost efficiency with deeper reasoning and more reliable multi-step execution, making it well suited for advanced coding, computer use, and agentic workflows where higher solution quality is needed without moving to a larger GPT-6 tier. | GLM-5.3-Flash is Z.AI's efficient native multimodal model, designed for coding and long-horizon agentic workflows. It combines strong multimodal capabilities with an architecture optimized for responsive, cost-efficient task execution. Built on a hybrid sparse and linear attention architecture, GLM-5.3-Flash maintains accurate long-context behavior while reducing computational overhead, making it well suited for coding agents, extended multi-step tasks, and scalable production workloads. | Claude Opus 5.5 is Anthropic's flagship model for advanced reasoning, coding, and long-horizon agentic workflows, succeeding Opus 5. It excels at multi-step changes across large codebases, code review and bug detection, financial and scientific analysis, and understanding dense charts, diagrams, and screenshots, with stronger grounding when reporting figures and citing sources. Compared with Opus 5, it completes comparable tasks with fewer steps and lower token usage while providing clearer, more concise progress reporting. With adaptive thinking and configurable effort levels, Opus 5.5 can balance reasoning depth, latency, and cost, making it well suited for both demanding autonomous workflows and latency-sensitive professional tasks. |