Skip to content

Compare models

Put up to 4 models beside each other — token prices, context windows, capabilities and provider, from the same catalogue the model pages read.

  1. Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogleRemove
  2. GPT-4o Mini TranscribeOpenAIRemove
  3. Claude Fable 5.1AnthropicRemove
gemini-3.7-flash vs gpt-4o-mini-transcribe vs claude-fable-5.1
AttributeGemini 3.7 Flashgemini-3.7-flashGPT-4o Mini Transcribegpt-4o-mini-transcribeClaude Fable 5.1claude-fable-5.1
Pricing
Input$0.375 / 1M$0.625 / 1M$10.00 / 1M
Output$1.88 / 1M$0.625 / 1M$50.00 / 1M
Cache Write (5m)$0.375 / 1MNot applicable$12.50 / 1M
Cache Write (1h)$0.375 / 1MNot applicable$20.00 / 1M
Cache Read$0.375 / 1MNot applicable$1.00 / 1M
Web Search$0 / 1M$0 / 1M$0 / 1M
Context
Max context1M128K1M
Max outputN/AN/AN/A
Capabilities
VisionYesNoYes
Function CallingYesNoYes
JSON ModeYesYesYes
StreamingYesNoYes
Catalogue
ProviderGoogleOpenAIAnthropic
Categorychatvoicechat
Charge typePay As You GoPay As You GoPay As You Go
Released
Description
SummaryGemini 3.7 Flash is Google's fast multimodal model designed for agentic workflows, coding, and complex multi-step reasoning. It combines responsive inference with reliable problem-solving capabilities, making it well suited for interactive and production-scale applications. Optimized for speed and dependable multi-step execution, Gemini 3.7 Flash is a strong choice for coding assistants, autonomous agents, and high-throughput workflows that require both low latency and capable reasoning.GPT-4o Mini Transcribe is a smaller, cost-efficient speech-to-text model built on GPT-4o Mini's audio capabilities. It is designed for high-volume transcription workloads, delivering reliable performance with lower cost and latency. Priced per token (input and output), it provides transparent, fine-grained billing, making it well suited for scalable transcription pipelines, real-time applications, and cost-sensitive deployments.Claude Fable 5.1 is an upgraded version of Fable 5, delivering broad improvements with particularly strong gains in agentic coding, long-running workflows, and professional knowledge work. It excels at large code refactors, front-end and visual code generation, financial analysis, and complex analytical tasks. Compared with Fable 5, it also produces more concise plans and summaries while maintaining strong performance across extended tasks, making it a natural upgrade for existing Fable workflows and a strong option alongside Opus 5 for reasoning-intensive applications.