Compare models
Put up to 4 models beside each other — token prices, context windows, capabilities and provider, from the same catalogue the model pages read.
| Attribute | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (Free)nemotron-3.5-super-vl:free | Gemini 3.5 Transcribegemini-3.5-transcribe | Claude Fable 5.1claude-fable-5.1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing | |||
| Input | $0 / 1M | — Not priced per input token | $10.00 / 1M |
| Output | $0 / 1M | — Not priced per output token | $50.00 / 1M |
| Cache Write | $0 / 1M | — | — |
| Cache Read | $0 / 1M | Not applicable | $0.25 / 1M |
| Cache Write (5m) | — | Not applicable | $12.50 / 1M |
| Cache Write (1h) | — | Not applicable | $20.00 / 1M |
| Web Search | — | $0 / 1M | $0 / 1M |
| Context | |||
| Max context | 1M | 98.3K | 1M |
| Max output | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Capabilities | |||
| Vision | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Function Calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| JSON Mode | Yes | No | Yes |
| Streaming | Yes | No | Yes |
| Catalogue | |||
| Provider | NVIDIA | Anthropic | |
| Category | chat | voice | chat |
| Charge type | Free | Pay As You Go | Pay As You Go |
| Released | — | 2026-09-25 | — |
| Description | |||
| Summary | NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is an open multimodal Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model featuring 120B total parameters with 12B activated per token. Built on a hybrid Mamba–Transformer architecture with multi-token prediction, it supports text, images, documents, GUI screenshots, and video inputs, along with a 1M-token context window for complex, long-horizon workflows. Optimized for multimodal reasoning, visual understanding, and agentic tool use, the model supports configurable reasoning modes and token budgets. It is well suited for document intelligence, web research, coding validation, customer service, GUI analysis, and video understanding, enabling efficient, long-running multimodal agent applications. | Google Gemini 3.5 Transcribe speech-to-text. Billed per input and output token. | Claude Fable 5.1 is an upgraded version of Fable 5, delivering broad improvements with particularly strong gains in agentic coding, long-running workflows, and professional knowledge work. It excels at large code refactors, front-end and visual code generation, financial analysis, and complex analytical tasks. Compared with Fable 5, it also produces more concise plans and summaries while maintaining strong performance across extended tasks, making it a natural upgrade for existing Fable workflows and a strong option alongside Opus 5 for reasoning-intensive applications. |