Compare models
Put up to 4 models beside each other — token prices, context windows, capabilities and provider, from the same catalogue the model pages read.
| Attribute | Gemini 3.5 Transcribegemini-3.5-transcribe | DeepSeek V4.1 Flashdeepseek-v4.1-flash | Claude Fable 5.1claude-fable-5.1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing | |||
| Input | — Not priced per input token | $0.30 / 1M | $10.00 / 1M |
| Output | — Not priced per output token | $1.20 / 1M | $50.00 / 1M |
| Cache Write (5m) | Not applicable | $0.30 / 1M | $12.50 / 1M |
| Cache Write (1h) | Not applicable | $0.30 / 1M | $20.00 / 1M |
| Cache Read | Not applicable | $0.30 / 1M | $0.25 / 1M |
| Web Search | $0 / 1M | $0 / 1M | $0 / 1M |
| Context | |||
| Max context | 98.3K | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Capabilities | |||
| Vision | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Function Calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| JSON Mode | No | Yes | Yes |
| Streaming | No | Yes | Yes |
| Catalogue | |||
| Provider | DeepSeek | Anthropic | |
| Category | voice | chat | chat |
| Charge type | Pay As You Go | Pay As You Go | Pay As You Go |
| Released | 2026-09-25 | — | — |
| Description | |||
| Summary | Google Gemini 3.5 Transcribe speech-to-text. Billed per input and output token. | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is a cost-efficient sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model in DeepSeek's V4.1 family, optimized for coding, reasoning, and agentic workflows. Despite its efficiency-focused positioning, DeepSeek reports that it surpasses the previous V4 Pro in performance, inference speed, and overall task completion time. The model is particularly strong at long-horizon, multi-step execution, making it well suited for coding agents, complex problem solving, and autonomous workflows that must reliably carry tasks through to completion. | Claude Fable 5.1 is an upgraded version of Fable 5, delivering broad improvements with particularly strong gains in agentic coding, long-running workflows, and professional knowledge work. It excels at large code refactors, front-end and visual code generation, financial analysis, and complex analytical tasks. Compared with Fable 5, it also produces more concise plans and summaries while maintaining strong performance across extended tasks, making it a natural upgrade for existing Fable workflows and a strong option alongside Opus 5 for reasoning-intensive applications. |