Skip to content

Compare models

Put up to 4 models beside each other — token prices, context windows, capabilities and provider, from the same catalogue the model pages read.

  1. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image (Google AI Studio)GoogleRemove
  2. Claude Sonnet 5.5AnthropicRemove
gemini-3.1-flash-lite-image-aistudio vs claude-sonnet-5.5
AttributeGemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image (Google AI Studio)gemini-3.1-flash-lite-image-aistudioClaude Sonnet 5.5claude-sonnet-5.5
Pricing
Request$0.0336 / request—
BillingPay Per Request—
Cache Write (5m)Not applicable$2.50 / 1M
Cache Write (1h)Not applicable$4.00 / 1M
Cache ReadNot applicable$0.20 / 1M
Input—$2.00 / 1M
Output—$10.00 / 1M
Web Search—$0 / 1M
Context
Max contextN/A1M
Max outputN/AN/A
Capabilities
VisionYesYes
Function CallingNoYes
JSON ModeNoYes
StreamingNoYes
Catalogue
ProviderGoogleAnthropic
Categoryimagechat
Charge typePay Per RequestPay As You Go
Released——
Description
SummaryGemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image served from Google AI Studio. Billed per image at US$0.0336. Call it through /v1/chat/completions with stream set to false; the image is returned in the message content as a base64 data URI.Claude Sonnet 5.5 is Anthropic's Sonnet-class model for well-scoped everyday work, serving as a direct upgrade to Sonnet 5. It excels at feature development, bug fixing, and creating polished documents, presentations, and spreadsheets, while offering clearer writing and communication than its predecessor.